<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Studying the obvious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shrimpandgrits.rickandpatty.com/2008/01/03/studying-the-obvious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shrimpandgrits.rickandpatty.com/2008/01/03/studying-the-obvious/</link>
	<description>Science, science education, and other things ... with a distinctly Southern drawl</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://shrimpandgrits.rickandpatty.com/2008/01/03/studying-the-obvious/#comment-21008</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrimpandgrits.rickandpatty.com/2008/01/03/studying-the-obvious/#comment-21008</guid>
		<description>When I was in high school (public high school, rural Maryland) I had an argement with a chemistry teacher about this.  She was fresh out of college, so senility was not an excuse, nor was the innability to remember something that happened years ago.  The argument (keep in mind, this was twenty-five (TWENTY-FIVE?  I'm OLD!) years ago, and my memory keeps, um, what's the word?) went something like this:

Teacher:  When wood burns, oxygen combines with the carbon and thus there is a net loss of weight, though the mass remains the same.

Me:  But doesn't oxygen have weight?

T:  Does the air feel heavy to you?

M:  If oxygen had no weight, it would escape the earth's gravity and we would exhale ourselves to death (I was, and still am, a fan of Jonny Hart's B.C. and that's where I stole that line).

T:  Are you saying I am wrong?

M:  Yes.

T:  Take this note to the office.

Now, to be fair, she was teaching chemistry, but her degree was in physics, though she also had a generalized secondary teaching certification in science.  I went and talke to the vice-principal.  His jaw hit the floor.  The next day, she apologized in class and said she had done some quick research and, lo and behold, Billy was right.

I still majored in history, though.  

I agree with you that even something that is intuitively obvious should be checked.  I ran across another study (don't remember where) which said that the biggest problem with cell-phone use while driving was NOT THE CELL PHONE!  It was carrying on a conversation with someone outside the vehicle that was the primary distractant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in high school (public high school, rural Maryland) I had an argement with a chemistry teacher about this.  She was fresh out of college, so senility was not an excuse, nor was the innability to remember something that happened years ago.  The argument (keep in mind, this was twenty-five (TWENTY-FIVE?  I&#8217;m OLD!) years ago, and my memory keeps, um, what&#8217;s the word?) went something like this:</p>
<p>Teacher:  When wood burns, oxygen combines with the carbon and thus there is a net loss of weight, though the mass remains the same.</p>
<p>Me:  But doesn&#8217;t oxygen have weight?</p>
<p>T:  Does the air feel heavy to you?</p>
<p>M:  If oxygen had no weight, it would escape the earth&#8217;s gravity and we would exhale ourselves to death (I was, and still am, a fan of Jonny Hart&#8217;s B.C. and that&#8217;s where I stole that line).</p>
<p>T:  Are you saying I am wrong?</p>
<p>M:  Yes.</p>
<p>T:  Take this note to the office.</p>
<p>Now, to be fair, she was teaching chemistry, but her degree was in physics, though she also had a generalized secondary teaching certification in science.  I went and talke to the vice-principal.  His jaw hit the floor.  The next day, she apologized in class and said she had done some quick research and, lo and behold, Billy was right.</p>
<p>I still majored in history, though.  </p>
<p>I agree with you that even something that is intuitively obvious should be checked.  I ran across another study (don&#8217;t remember where) which said that the biggest problem with cell-phone use while driving was NOT THE CELL PHONE!  It was carrying on a conversation with someone outside the vehicle that was the primary distractant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
